{"id":57215,"date":"2025-12-15T11:16:13","date_gmt":"2025-12-15T04:16:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hbbgroup.net\/firestorm-erupts-in-aave-governance-forum-over-cow-swap-fees\/"},"modified":"2025-12-15T11:16:13","modified_gmt":"2025-12-15T04:16:13","slug":"firestorm-erupts-in-aave-governance-forum-over-cow-swap-fees","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hbbgroup.net\/zh\/firestorm-erupts-in-aave-governance-forum-over-cow-swap-fees\/","title":{"rendered":"Firestorm erupts in Aave governance forum over CoW Swap fees"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Members of the Aave DAO clashed with Aave Labs, with some arguing that the company was not acting in the best interests of token holders. <\/p>\n

\"Firestorm<\/picture><\/div>\n
\n
\n

A dispute between the Aave decentralized autonomous organization (DAO), which governs the Aave decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol, and Aave Labs, the main development company for Aave products, over fees from the recently announced integration with decentralized exchange aggregator CoW Swap, continues to flare up.<\/p>\n

The issue<\/a> was raised by pseudonymous Aave DAO member EzR3aL, who said that the fees generated by crypto asset swaps<\/a> using CoW Swap were going to a different onchain address, not the treasury of the Aave decentralized autonomous organization<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Instead, the fees are going to a private address controlled by Aave Labs. EzR3aL raised several questions, including why the DAO was not consulted before the fees were routed, and argued that the fees belong to the DAO.<\/p>\n

\"Decentralization,
The governance forum post that sparked the debate. Source: <\/em>Aave Governance<\/em><\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

\u201cAnother entity, rather than the Aave DAO, is receiving at least $200,000 per week worth of Ether,\u201d EzR3aL said, adding that this amounts to $10 million of potential annual revenue kept from the DAO.<\/p>\n

Aave Labs responded that the front-end components for the website and application interfaces have always been the rightful purview of Aave Labs.<\/p>\n

Aave Labs also claimed that it was the entity that funded the development of the \u201cadapters,\u201d the lines of code that allow swaps and other integrations to work.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\"Decentralization,
The total value locked in the Aave protocol and a financial overview of the DeFi platform. Source: <\/em>DeFiLlama<\/em><\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

However, the response did little to curb the tension, with several DAO members saying that the Aave DAO funded the development of the original adapter technology; therefore, the revenue from the integration should flow back to the DAO.<\/p>\n

Marc Zeller, the founder of the Aave-Chan Initiative, a delegate platform serving the Aave governance community, said<\/a> the decision to route the fees exclusively to Aave Labs is \u201cextremely concerning.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cAave Labs, in the pursuit of their own monetization, redirected Aave user volume towards competition. This is unacceptable,\u201d Zeller said.<\/p>\n

Cointelegraph reached out to Aave Labs but did not obtain an immediate response by the time of publication.<\/p>\n

The conflict highlights the complexities of running a DAO<\/a>, which is a novel form of governance and organization that has benefits over traditional business structures but also brings its own unique challenges.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Magazine: <\/strong><\/em>The one thing these 6 global crypto hubs all have in common\u2026<\/strong><\/em><\/a><\/p>\n