The One Big Beautiful Bill contains many worrying aspects that further increase the debt level, without a strong economic impulse. Beyond the headline tax cuts, it also contains some proposals for various taxes, such as Section 899, that look an awful lot like capital controls. Various members of the Trump administration have spoken out in favor of such controls. Similar to tariffs, capital controls can reduce the trade deficit, and similar to tariffs, they are stagflationary. In contrast to tariffs, capital controls in theory reduce the value of the dollar, ABN AMRO’s economist Rogier Quaedvlieg reports.
Foreign investors may lose further confidence in the U.S.
“Section 899 of the Big Beautiful Bill enables the U.S. government to levy taxes on individuals and businesses from countries with ‘discriminatory’ tax regimes. According to the Tax Foundation, nations with ‘unfair taxes’ contribute approximately 80% of inbound foreign investment into the U.S. To some extent, the U.S. already possessed this capability under Section 891 of the current tax code, which could double the taxes for citizens and firms from such countries. A crucial distinction lies in the exemption for portfolio interest earned, potentially shifting foreign demand from other inbound investments to Treasuries, further supporting the notion that the government is actively seeking to bolster Treasury demand.”
“A decline in demand for other U.S. assets would lead to higher borrowing costs and inhibit investment, reducing productivity and trend growth. Elevated borrowing costs would also suppress import demand, narrowing the trade balance. However, it would also adversely impact demand for domestically produced goods. The Federal Reserve could potentially intervene by lowering rates. This would further suppress the dollar, making imports more expensive, further narrowing the trade balance. Even then, this scenario confronts the same limitations already faced by the Trump administration: the U.S. economy cannot immediately produce all the goods it currently imports. The only solution is for the US to consume less.”
“The overall impact on the economy would not be favorable, and the repercussions for financial markets could be significantly worse. This reputational damage has arguably been a major factor driving the dollar’s devaluation in recent months. Ifc – which implementation of capital controls would certainly do – there would be severe adverse effects on the dollar and yields. A depreciated dollar would raise inflation, and higher rates would further impede investment. In summary, although the channels differ from tariffs, the outcome remains a stagflationary shock.”
Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers. The author will not be held responsible for information that is found at the end of links posted on this page.
If not otherwise explicitly mentioned in the body of the article, at the time of writing, the author has no position in any stock mentioned in this article and no business relationship with any company mentioned. The author has not received compensation for writing this article, other than from FXStreet.
FXStreet and the author do not provide personalized recommendations. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. FXStreet and the author will not be liable for any errors, omissions or any losses, injuries or damages arising from this information and its display or use. Errors and omissions excepted.
The author and FXStreet are not registered investment advisors and nothing in this article is intended to be investment advice.
