{"id":68094,"date":"2026-04-06T08:41:35","date_gmt":"2026-04-06T01:41:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hbbgroup.net\/bitcoin-holds-steady-as-sentiment-hits-worst-levels-since-iran-war-began\/"},"modified":"2026-04-06T08:41:35","modified_gmt":"2026-04-06T01:41:35","slug":"bitcoin-holds-steady-as-sentiment-hits-worst-levels-since-iran-war-began","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hbbgroup.net\/vi\/bitcoin-holds-steady-as-sentiment-hits-worst-levels-since-iran-war-began\/","title":{"rendered":"Bitcoin holds steady as sentiment hits worst levels since Iran war began"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Bitcoin holds steady as sentiment hits worst levels since Iran war began<\/h2>\n

Social sentiment, on-chain data, and positioning metrics all hit extremes not seen since late February, even as institutional buying remains elevated.<\/h2>\n
\n

Diperbarui 5 Apr 2026, 11.56 a.m. <\/span>Diterbitkan 5 Apr 2026, 11.54 a.m. <\/span><\/p>\n

<\/g><\/clippath><\/defs><\/svg>Diterjemahkan oleh AI<\/a><\/div>\n

Make <\/svg> preferred on <\/svg><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Bitcoin is trading at $67,100 on Sunday, roughly flat over the weekend, but the mood around it is the worst it has been since the Iran conflict began on February 28.<\/p>\n

Santiment data published Saturday shows social media commentary on bitcoin has hit a ratio of five bearish posts for every four bullish ones, the most negative skew in five weeks. The last time sentiment was this one-sided was the day Operation Epic Fury launched and bitcoin dropped below $65,000 for the first time in the conflict.<\/p>\n

\n
\n

\ud83d\udde3\ufe0f According to social data across X, Reddit, Telegram, and other platforms, Bitcoin is seeing the highest ratio of bearish discussions (fear) since February 28th. With crypto’s #1 market cap sitting at $66.8K, FUD has crept back in with the community showing a key lack of\u2026 pic.twitter.com\/Ym7SbUC22I<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Santiment \u2708\ufe0f \ud83c\uddeb\ud83c\uddf7 EthCC (@santimentfeed) April 4, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote><\/div>\n

The Fear and Greed Index sits at 9, deep in extreme fear territory, where it has been pinned between 8 and 14 for over a month. That kind of sustained single-digit reading without a corresponding price collapse is unusual. In 2022, the index hit comparable levels during the LUNA crash and the FTX implosion, both of which involved actual capitulation events with 20% to 30% single-day drawdowns. This time, bitcoin is grinding sideways in a $65,000 to $73,000 range while sentiment collapses around it.<\/p>\n

What matters is that sentiment and price are telling completely different stories. Bitcoin has spent five weeks absorbing war headlines, Trump speeches, $403 million liquidation events, and the most bearish on-chain demand data in years without actually going anywhere. It is still trading within 5% of where it was when the conflict started, grinding sideways while the mood around it collapses.<\/p>\n

The reason it hasn’t broken lower is visible in the institutional flow data. ETFs absorbed approximately 50,000 BTC in March, the highest monthly pace since October 2025. Strategy added another 44,000 BTC. Morgan Stanley received approval for a bitcoin ETF at 14 basis points, opening 16,000 advisors and $6.2 trillion in assets under management. The institutional bid is real and it is holding the floor.<\/p>\n

But the floor is all it is holding. A CoinDesk analysis<\/a> from early Saturday showed overall 30-day apparent demand at negative 63,000 BTC, meaning the rest of the market is selling faster than institutions can absorb. Whales holding 1,000 to 10,000 BTC have swung from adding 200,000 BTC a year ago to removing 188,000 today, one of the most aggressive distribution cycles on record.<\/p>\n

April has historically been one of bitcoin’s strongest months, finishing green 10 out of 15 years with an average gain of 20.9%. But seasonality does not trade against a war, a negative Coinbase Premium, record whale distribution, and a Fear and Greed Index stuck in single digits.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Lebih untuk Anda<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n
\"Encryption<\/figure>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Most crypto privacy models weaken as blockchain data grows. Encryption-based models like Zcash strengthen. CoinDesk Research maps the five privacy approaches and examines the widening gap.<\/p>\n

\n

Mengapa ini penting: <\/p>\n

As blockchain adoption scales, the metadata available to machine learning models scales with it. Obfuscation-based privacy approaches are structurally degrading as a result. This report provides a comprehensive comparison of all five major crypto privacy architectures and a framework for evaluating which models remain durable as AI capabilities improve.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

View Full Report<\/mask><\/g><\/svg><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Lebih untuk Anda<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n
\"(Vladislav<\/figure>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Bitcoin’s correlation with global central bank easing has turned strongly negative since 2024, suggesting BTC now leads rather than lags monetary policy signals.<\/p>\n

\n

Yang perlu diketahui: <\/p>\n

\n