Crypto’s CLARITY Act could be a headwind for DeFi tokens ring-fencing yield, analyst says
The proposed restriction on yield would shift value toward regulated players and away from decentralized finance’ tokens, 10x Research’s Markus Thielen said.
Mar 29, 2026, 4:00 p.m.
What to know:
- The CLARITY Act would ban yield on stablecoins, redefining them as payment tools, not savings products.
- The proposal, if passed, could re-centralize yield into traditional finance and regulated products, creating a headwind for decentralized finance (DeFi), 10x Research’s Markus Thielen argued.
- The shift would favor Circle (CRCL) and regulated infrastructure, while weighing on DeFi tokens, Thielen said.
The latest version of the crypto bill Clarity Act is in the spotlight mostly because of its stablecoin rules. In practice, it may land hardest on decentralized finance (DeFi) and tokens tied to it, according to a report by 10x Research.
At the center of the proposal is a ban on offering yield — or anything resembling it like rewards — on stablecoin balances. That effectively ends the idea of stablecoins as onchain savings products and redefines them as pure payment rails.
“This represents a clear re-centralization of yield,” wrote Markus Thielen, founder of 10xResearch. This is because the proposal pulls back yield into banks, money market funds and regulated wrappers, leaving crypto-native platforms with less room to compete on returns.
That shift could also hit DeFi, despite early hopes it might benefit.
The logic was that if centralized platforms can’t offer yield, users would move onchain, Thielen said.
But that assumes DeFi escapes the same rules. In practice, the Clarity framework is likely to extend into front-end interfaces and token models, especially where fee generation or governance starts to resemble equity, he said.
That puts a wide swath of the sector in focus. Decentralized exchanges like Uniswap (UNI), SUSHI$0.1896 and dYdX (DYDX), as well as lending protocols like Aave AAVE$97.04 and COMP$18.29, could face tighter constraints around how they operate and distribute value, the report argued. The result could be lower volumes, reduced liquidity and weaker token demand.
On the other hand, the proposed regulation is “structurally bullish” for infrastructure players like Circle (CRCL) as it embeds stablecoins deeper into payment rails, Thielen said.
More For You
As stablecoins evolve into core financial infrastructure, North America leads. This report maps the regulation, market shifts, and players driving adoption.
Why it matters:
Stablecoins are entering their third phase of evolution – the institutionalization era – becoming increasingly embedded into core financial infrastructure. As institutions prioritize transparency and compliance, regulated issuers like USDC, RLUSD, and PYUSD are steadily gaining share with RLUSD surpassing $1B in market cap within its first year. North America, leading in regulatory frameworks and institutional distribution, is at the center of it all.
More For You
The company seemed to have skipped its weekly bitcoin purchase announcement for the first time since late December.
What to know:
- Strategy appeared to make no bitcoin purchases last week, after a run of 13 consecutive weekly buys.
- MSTR is down about 77% from its peak in November 2024.
