{ "id": 57705, "date": "2025-12-24T09:26:25", "date_gmt": "2025-12-24T02:26:25", "guid": { "rendered": "https:\/\/hbbgroup.net\/xrp-breaks-1-95-support-after-13-months-analyst-sees-0-90-target\/" }, "modified": "2025-12-24T09:26:25", "modified_gmt": "2025-12-24T02:26:25", "slug": "xrp-breaks-1-95-support-after-13-months-analyst-sees-0-90-target", "status": "publish", "type": "post", "link": "https:\/\/hbbgroup.net\/en_us\/xrp-breaks-1-95-support-after-13-months-analyst-sees-0-90-target\/", "title": { "rendered": "XRP Breaks $1.95 Support After 13 Months, Analyst Sees $0.90 Target" }, "content": { "rendered": "
\n

XRP has slipped below a level that, for much of the past year, acted like a structural anchor for the chart: the $1.95 area. Crypto analyst Guy on the Earth (@guyontheearth) argued that XRP has now closed under that zone on a higher timeframe, calling out the two-week chart specifically. \u201cFor the first time in 13 months XRP has closed under this monthly support at $1.95 on the 2 week chart,\u201d he wrote. \u201cIt\u2019s the second time on the weekly this has happened with April tariffs being the first.\u201d<\/p>\n

The 2-Weekly Close Is Crucial For XRP<\/h2>\n

From there, his analysis went straight to the downside implication. \u201cThe technical target of this break down is 90c,\u201d he added. \u201cDo with this information what you have to. Everyone must make their own decisions at this time. The goal is getting back above $1.95.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"XRP
XRP price analysis, 2-week chart | Source: X @guyontheearth<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The way he laid it out, $1.95 was not simply a mid-range price level but the lower boundary of a broader consolidation \u201crectangle.\u201d Losing it, in that framework, opens the door to a measured move lower \u2014 with the reclaim of $1.95 as the key invalidation.<\/p>\n

He also offered a risk-management approach for holders<\/a> who are uncomfortable sitting through a potential continuation move. \u201cIf you are uncomfortable holding your bags with this breakdown \u2013 sell to reduce risk to where you feel comfortable,\u201d he wrote. \u201cBuy back on a close above $1.95 on the daily ( or a timeframe that you believe in) and your % loss of XRP is next to nothing. But should we go to 90c you are looking at a further 50% loss in capital.\u201d<\/p>\n

For those treating the move as an opportunity rather than a warning sign, he mapped out incremental levels he views as potential buy zones on the way down. \u201cAlternatively if you believe in XRP longer term and don\u2019t like trading at all \u2013 keep buying on the way down,\u201d he wrote. \u201cKey levels are at $1.61, $1.42 and finally the 90c target and the 75c initial breakout.\u201d<\/p>\n

Even in a bearish framing, he cautioned against assuming a straight-line cascade into every marked level. \u201cWe have went in a straight line down for weeks so it is unlikely that these targets would all be hit imminently,\u201d he said. \u201c$1.42 lowest this week if things get really ugly \u2013 not massively likely but possible with this breakdown and a big sell off in BTC to lower lows.\u201d<\/p>\n

Not everyone agreed with the choice of timeframe used to call the breakdown. One account, XRP whale (@cryptoXRPwhale), pushed back on the premise: \u201c2 week chart is not significant. You can\u2019t choose a specific timeframe and say it\u2019s a structure breakdown that fits your narrative\u2026 lol\u201d Guy responded by reiterating that the level being referenced is higher-timeframe support, not a short-term marker. \u201cLook at the chart. It held 13 months and now broke structure,\u201d he wrote. \u201cThe lower boundary is monthly support. I\u2019ve said all this.\u201d<\/p>\n

There was also an attempt in the replies to flip the bearish target into a bullish setup. \u201cAny price under $1 will be short-lived & sets $XRP up for a stronger push to the upside past ATH,\u201d wrote Lawrence Bensen (@Lawrence_Bensen), referencing prior cycle lows and a reported wick below $1 on Binance earlier in the cycle. Guy acknowledged the point while keeping the technical math intact. \u201cYeah for sure \u2013 it has already been to 90c on Binance [on October 10]<\/a>,\u201d he wrote. \u201cI think we will recover before going as low as 90c \u2013 but that is the technical target of losing this consolidation.\u201d<\/p>\n

His near-term bias, meanwhile, leaned toward caution largely on liquidity conditions rather than an absolute conviction that $0.90 must print. \u201cMy bias is that I find it hard to believe at Christmas people are going<\/a> to throw heaps of money in this market,\u201d he wrote. \u201cLow liquidity has been an issue anyways and this week wont help. So the slow bleed continues.\u201d<\/p>\n

At press time, XRP stood at $1.89.<\/p>\n

\"XRP
XRP hovers below the red zone, 1-week chart | Source: XRPUSDT on TradingView.com<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>", "protected": false }, "excerpt": { "rendered": "

XRP has slipped below a level that, for much of the past year, acted like a structural anchor for the […]<\/p>", "protected": false }, "author": 5, "featured_media": 0, "comment_status": "open", "ping_status": "open", "sticky": false, "template": "", "format": "standard", "meta": { "_acf_changed": false, "footnotes": "" }, "categories": [ 220 ], "tags": [], "class_list": [ "post-57705", "post", "type-post", "status-publish", "format-standard", "hentry", "category-tien-dien-tu" ], "acf": [], "_links": { "self": [ { "href": "https:\/\/hbbgroup.net\/en_us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57705", "targetHints": { "allow": [ "GET" ] } } ], "collection": [ { "href": "https:\/\/hbbgroup.net\/en_us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts" } ], "about": [ { "href": "https:\/\/hbbgroup.net\/en_us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post" } ], "author": [ { "embeddable": true, "href": "https:\/\/hbbgroup.net\/en_us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5" } ], "replies": [ { "embeddable": true, "href": "https:\/\/hbbgroup.net\/en_us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57705" } ], "version-history": [ { "count": 0, "href": "https:\/\/hbbgroup.net\/en_us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57705\/revisions" } ], "wp:attachment": [ { "href": "https:\/\/hbbgroup.net\/en_us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57705" } ], "wp:term": [ { "taxonomy": "category", "embeddable": true, "href": "https:\/\/hbbgroup.net\/en_us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57705" }, { "taxonomy": "post_tag", "embeddable": true, "href": "https:\/\/hbbgroup.net\/en_us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57705" } ], "curies": [ { "name": "wp", "href": "https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}", "templated": true } ] } }